The Welfare Effects of Transportation Infrastructure Improvements
We develop a general equilibrium geographic framework to characterize the welfare effect of transportation infrastructure investments. We tackle three distinct but conflating challenges: First, we offer an analytical characterization of the routing problem and, in particular, how infrastructure investment between any two connected locations decreases the total trade costs between all pairs of locations. Second, we characterize how this cost reduction affects welfare within a standard general equilibrium geography setup where market inefficiencies arise due to agglomeration and dispersion spillovers. Finally, we show how our framework admits analytical characterizations of traffic congestion, which creates a critical – albeit tractable – feedback loop between trade costs and the general equilibrium economic system. We apply these results to calculate the welfare effects of improving each of the thousands of segments of the U.S. national highway network. We find large but heterogeneous welfare effects, with the largest gains concentrated in metropolitan areas and along important trading corridors.
We thank David Atkin, Dave Donaldson, Pablo Fajgelbaum, Xiangliang Li, and Sam Kortum for very helpful discussions and the National Science Foundation for funding. Narek Alexanian, Lucas Conwell, Yujing (Amy) Hu, and Zijian He provided excellent research assistance. All remaining errors are our own. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Even for highways in rural mountainous areas, the estimated economic benefits from adding an additional lane-mile exceed the annual...