Peer Advice on Financial Decisions: A case of the blind leading the blind?
We investigate the impact of peer interaction on the quality of financial decision making in a laboratory experiment. Face-to-face communication with a randomly assigned peer significantly improves the quality of subsequent private decisions even though simple mimicry would have the opposite effect. We present evidence that the mechanism involves general conceptual learning (because the benefits of communication extend to previously unseen tasks), and that the most effective learning relationships are horizontal rather than vertical (because people with weak skills benefit most when their partners also have weak skills). The benefits of demonstrably effective financial education do not propagate to peers.
-
-
Copy CitationSandro Ambuehl, B. Douglas Bernheim, Fulya Ersoy, and Donna Harris, "Peer Advice on Financial Decisions: A case of the blind leading the blind?," NBER Working Paper 25034 (2018), https://doi.org/10.3386/w25034.Download Citation
-
-
Related
Programs
Working Groups
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
