Gender and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from COVID-19 Response
Working Paper 32410
DOI 10.3386/w32410
Issue Date
Revision Date
This paper provides new evidence on why men and women leaders make different choices. Exploiting Brazilian close elections, we show that female mayors responded differently to the COVID-19 crisis over the year 2020. Female mayors were less likely to close non-essential businesses early in the pandemic and female-led municipalities experienced higher mortality, while the reverse was true later on. We show that these findings can be rationalized by a simple political agency model in which politicians seek re-election and voters are gender biased. Consistent with this interpretation, the gender differences we find are driven exclusively by mayors facing re-election.
-
-
Copy CitationJuan Pablo Chauvin and Clemence Tricaud, "Gender and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from COVID-19 Response," NBER Working Paper 32410 (2024), https://doi.org/10.3386/w32410.Download Citation
-