Research Funding and Collaboration
We analyse whether research funding contests promote co-authorship. Our analysis combines Scopus publication records with data on applications to the Marsden Fund, the premiere source of funding for basic research in New Zealand. On average, and after controlling for observable and unobservable heterogeneity, applicant pairs were 13.8 percentage points more likely to co-author in a given year if they co-proposed during the previous ten years than if they did not. This co-authorship rate was not significantly higher among funded pairs. However, when we increase post-proposal publication lags towards the length of a typical award, we find that funding, rather than participation, promotes co-authorship.
The research discussed in this paper was supported by Te Pūnaha Matatini. We thank Ben Jones, Dave Maré and seminar participants at Motu for helpful suggestions. Jason Gush is employed by the administrator of the Fund being studied, i.e., the Royal Society of New Zealand, as their "Programme Manager - Insights and Evaluation". The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Benjamin Davies & Jason Gush & Shaun C. Hendy & Adam B. Jaffe, 2022. "Research funding and collaboration," Research Policy, vol 51(2). citation courtesy of