Do Environmental Markets Improve on Open Access? Evidence from California Groundwater Rights
Environmental markets are widely prescribed as an alternative to open-access regimes for natural resources. We develop a model of dynamic groundwater extraction to demonstrate how a spatial regression discontinuity design that exploits a spatially-incomplete market for groundwater rights recovers a lower bound on the market’s net benefit. We apply this estimator to a major aquifer in water-scarce southern California and find that a groundwater market generated substantial net benefits, as capitalized in land values. Heterogeneity analyses point to gains arising in part from rights trading, enabling more efficient water use across sectors. Additional findings suggest the market increased groundwater levels.
-
-
Copy CitationAndrew B. Ayres, Kyle C. Meng, and Andrew J. Plantinga, "Do Environmental Markets Improve on Open Access? Evidence from California Groundwater Rights," NBER Working Paper 26268 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3386/w26268.Download Citation
-
Published Versions
Andrew B. Ayres & Kyle C. Meng & Andrew J. Plantinga, 2021. "Do Environmental Markets Improve on Open Access? Evidence from California Groundwater Rights," Journal of Political Economy, vol 129(10), pages 2817-2860.
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
