Gender Differences in Cooperative Environments? Evidence from the U.S. Congress
This paper uses data on bill sponsorship and cosponsorship in the U.S. House of Representatives to estimate gender differences in cooperative behavior. We employ a number of econometric methodologies to address the potential selection of female representatives into electoral districts with distinct preferences for cooperativeness, including regression discontinuity and matching. After accounting for selection, we find that among Democrats there is no significant gender gap in the number of cosponsors recruited, but women-sponsored bills tend to have fewer cosponsors from the opposite party. On the other hand, we find robust evidence that Republican women recruit more cosponsors and attract more bipartisan support on the bills that they sponsor. This is particularly true on bills that address issues more relevant for women, over which female Republicans have possibly preferences that are closer to those of Democrats. We interpret these results as evidence that cooperation is mostly driven by a commonality of interest, rather than gender per se.
We thank Analia Schlosser, Laurent Bouton, and seminar participants at Bocconi University, Boston University, Georgetown University, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Queen Mary University of London, Sciences Po, Stockholm University, Tor Vergata University, University of Warwick, SUNY Buffalo, and the Economics Workshop at IDC-Herzliya for many helpful suggestions. Giacomo Brusco, Ying Lei, Amanda Loyola, Emily McCorry, Ben Sabath and Nathaniel Young provided excellent research assistance. We also thank James Snyder for making the primaries data available. The authors declare that they have no relevant material or financial interests that relate to the research described in this paper. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Stefano Gagliarducci & M Daniele Paserman, 2022. "Gender Differences in Cooperative Environments? Evidence from The U.S. Congress," The Economic Journal, vol 132(641), pages 218-257.