Mining Surplus: Modeling James A. Schmitz's Link Between Competition and Productivity
James A. Schmitz (2005) documents, in a well-known case study, a dramatic rise in productivity in the U.S. and Canadian iron-ore industry following an increase in competition from Brazil. Prior to the increased competition, the industry was not competitive. Surplus in profits was divided between business and unions. Schmitz attributes the increase in productivity to a change in work practices in the industry, as old negotiated union work rules were abandoned or modified. This research formalizes a mechanism through which a rise in competition can lead to increased productivity in the iron-ore industry.
The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Jeremy Greenwood & David Weiss, 2018. "MINING SURPLUS: MODELING JAMES A. SCHMITZ'S LINK BETWEEN COMPETITION AND PRODUCTIVITY," International Economic Review, vol 59(3), pages 1015-1034. citation courtesy of