Group Health Insurance Versus ACA Marketplaces: Selection, Subsidies, and Welfare
Working Paper 33938
DOI 10.3386/w33938
Issue Date
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) changed incentives for individual and employer-sponsored insurance. Using unique small group market (SGM) data with detailed claims and enrollment information, we analyze the welfare gains across households in the SGM from alternative formulations of ACA health insurance exchanges (HIXs). Accounting for observable heterogeneity increases estimated demand elasticities. Shutting down the SGM would reduce equilibrium adverse selection in HIX-type markets, increasing welfare for households moved to HIXs by $842 annually. The majority of households would obtain higher equilibrium welfare from HIXs, stemming from having more choices. Adding the 2014 ACA penalties only modestly decreases adverse selection.