How Far Is Too Far? New Evidence on Abortion Clinic Closures, Access, and Abortions
NBER Working Paper No. 23366
Issued in April 2017, Revised in August 2018
NBER Program(s):Children, Health Care, Health Economics, Law and Economics, Public Economics
We document the effects of abortion-clinic closures on clinic access, abortions, and births using variation generated by a law that shuttered nearly half of Texas' clinics. Increases in distance have significant effects for women initially living within 200 miles of a clinic. The largest effect is for those nearest to clinics for whom a 25-mile increase reduces abortion 10%. We also demonstrate the importance of congestion with a proxy capturing effects of closures which have little impact on distance but which reduce clinics per-capita. These effects account for 59% of the effects of clinic closures on abortion.
The NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health provides summaries of publications like this.
You can sign up to receive the NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health by email.
Machine-readable bibliographic record -
Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w23366
Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
|Fischer, Royer, and White
||w23634 The Impacts of Reduced Access to Abortion and Family Planning Services on Abortion, Births, and Contraceptive Purchases
|Bailey and Lindo
||w23465 Access and Use of Contraception and Its Effects on Womenâs Outcomes in the U.S.
|Clark, Pinkovskiy, and Sala-i-Martin
||w23323 China's GDP Growth May be Understated
|Piketty, Yang, and Zucman
||w23368 Capital Accumulation, Private Property and Rising Inequality in China, 1978-2015
|Cawley, de Walque, and Grossman
||w23334 The Effect of Stress on Later-Life Health: Evidence from the Vietnam Draft