The Spatial Distribution of Housing-Related Tax Benefits in the United States

Todd Sinai, Joseph Gyourko

NBER Working Paper No. 8165
Issued in March 2001
NBER Program(s):Public Economics

Using 1990 Census tract-level data, we estimate how tax subsidies to owner-occupied housing are distributed spatially across the United States, calculating their value as the difference in taxes currently paid by home owners and the taxes owners would pay if there were no preference for investing in one's home relative to other assets. The $164 billion national tax subsidy is highly skewed spatially with a few areas receiving large subsidies and most areas receiving small ones. If the program were self-financed on a lump sum basis, less than 20 percent of states and 10 percent of metropolitan areas would have net positive subsidies. These few metropolitan areas are situated almost exclusively along the California coast and in the Northeast from Washington, DC to Boston. At the state level, California stands out because it receives 25 percent of the national aggregate subsidy flow while being home to only 10 percent of the country's owners. At the metropolitan area level, owners in just three large CMSAs receive over 75 percent of all positive net benefits. And within a number of the larger metropolitan areas, the top quarter of owners receives 70 percent or more of the total subsidy flowing to the metro area.

download in pdf format
   (2726 K)

email paper

A non-technical summary of this paper is available in the July 2001 NBER Digest.  You can sign up to receive the NBER Digest by email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w8165

Published: Sinai, Todd and Joseph Gyourko. “The Spatial Distribution of Housing-Related Tax Benefits in the United States." Real Estate Economics 31, 4 (2003): 527-576.

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Sinai and Gyourko w10322 The (Un)changing Geographical Distribution of Housing Tax Benefits: 1980 to 2000
Sinai and Waldfogel w8709 Do Low-Income Housing Subsidies Increase Housing Consumption?
Baldwin and Lyons w2828 Exchange Rate Hysteresis: The Real Effects of Large vs Small Policy Misalignments
Himmelberg, Mayer, and Sinai w11643 Assessing High House Prices: Bubbles, Fundamentals, and Misperceptions
Aggarwal and Samwick w6634 The Other Side of the Tradeoff: The Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us