Multifactor Models Do Not Explain Deviations from the CAPM

A. Craig MacKinlay

NBER Working Paper No. 4756
Issued in June 1994
NBER Program(s):Asset Pricing Program

A number of studies have presented evidence rejecting the validity of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). This evidence has spawned research into possible explanations. These explanations can be divided into two main categories - the risk based alternatives and the nonrisk based alternatives. The risk based category includes multifactor asset pricing models developed under the assumptions of investor rationality and perfect capital markets. The nonrisk based category includes biases introduced in the empirical methodology, the existence of market frictions, or explanations arising from the presence of irrational investors. The distinction between the two categories is important for asset pricing applications such as estimation of the cost of capital. This paper proposes to distinguish between the two categories using ex ante analysis. A framework is developed showing that ex ante one should expect that CAPM deviations due to missing risk factors will be very difficult to statistically detect. In contrast, deviations resulting from nonrisk based sources will be easy to detect. Examination of empirical results leads to the conclusion that the risk based alternatives is not the whole story for the CAPM deviations. The implication of this conclusion is that the adoption of empirically developed multifactor asset pricing models may be premature.

download in pdf format
   (345 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w4756

Published: Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 38, no. 1 (1995): 3-28.

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
MacKinlay and Pastor w7162 Asset Pricing Models: Implications for Expected Returns and Portfolio Selection
Ferson w9441 Tests of Multifactor Pricing Models, Volatility Bounds and Portfolio Performance
Ang and Chen w11903 CAPM Over the Long Run: 1926-2001
Lewellen and Nagel w9974 The Conditional CAPM does not Explain Asset-Pricing Anamolies
Da, Guo, and Jagannathan w14889 CAPM for Estimating the Cost of Equity Capital: Interpreting the Empirical Evidence
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us