Basic Income and the Dynamics of Employment and Human Capital in a Non-Urban Disadvantaged Setting
Why and when could basic income inhibit employment? We randomize 200 dollars of basic income per month for two years within a non-urban disadvantaged sample tracked using high-frequency administrative data. The amount provided is 21% of average all-source income. In the short term (0.5 years after baseline), relative to the control group, treatment-group employment decreases by 58%, average all-source income remains constant, and health-investment rates increase. In the longer term (1.25 years after baseline), employment and health-investment rates revert to their control-group counterparts. Treatment participants receive basic income, take time off work, address health needs, and, subsequently, reintegrate into employment.
-
-
Copy CitationJorge Luis García, Patrick L. Warren, and L. Reed Watson, "Basic Income and the Dynamics of Employment and Human Capital in a Non-Urban Disadvantaged Setting," NBER Working Paper 33891 (2025), https://doi.org/10.3386/w33891.
-
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
