Do Ordeals Work for Selection Markets? Evidence from Health Insurance Auto-Enrollment
Are application hassles, or “ordeals,” an effective way to limit public program enrollment? We provide new evidence by studying (removal of) an auto-enrollment policy for health insurance, adding an extra step to enroll. This minor ordeal has a major impact, reducing enrollment by 33% and differentially excluding young, healthy, and economically disadvantaged people. Using a simple model, we show that adverse selection – a classic feature of insurance markets – undermines ordeals’ standard rationale of excluding low-value individuals, since they are also low-cost and may not be inefficient. Our analysis illustrates why ordeals targeting is unlikely to work well in selection markets.
-
-
Copy CitationMark Shepard and Myles Wagner, "Do Ordeals Work for Selection Markets? Evidence from Health Insurance Auto-Enrollment," NBER Working Paper 30781 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3386/w30781.
-
Related
Programs
Working Groups
Conferences
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
