How Incentive-Incompatible Deposit-Insurance Funds Fail

Edward J. Kane

NBER Working Paper No. 2836
Issued in February 1989
NBER Program(s):Monetary Economics

An incentive-incompatible deposit-insurance fund (IIDIF) is a scheme. Lot guaranteeing deposits at client institutions that deploys defective systems of information collection, client monitoring, and risk management. These defective systems encourage voluntary risk- taking by clients and by managers and politicians responsible for administering the fund. The paper focuses on how principal-agent conflicts and asymmetries in the distribution of information lead to myopic behavior by IIDIF managers and by politicians who appoint and constrain them. Drawing on data developed in legislative hearings and investigations and in sworn depositions, the paper documents that managers of IISIFs in Ohio and Maryland knew well in advance of their funds' 1985 failures that important clients were both economically insolvent and engaging in inappropriate forms of risk-taking. It also establishes that staff proposals for publicizing and bringing these clients' risk-taking under administrative control were repeatedly rejected. The analysis has a forward-looking purpose. Congress and federal regulators have managed the massively undercapitalized Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) in much the same way Ohio and Maryland officials did. Unless and until incentives supporting political, bureaucratic and private risk-taking are reformed, the possibility of a FSLIC meltdown cannot be dismissed. To encourage timely intervention into insolvencies developing in a deposit-insurance fund's client base, the most meaningful reforms would be to force the development and release of estimates of the market value of the insurance enterprise and to require fund managers to use the threat of takeover to force decapitalized clients to recapitalize well before they approach insolvency.

download in pdf format
   (525 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w2836


  • "The Incentive Incompatibility of Government Sponsored Deposit-Insurance Funds," George Kaufman (ed.), Research in Financial Services: Private and Public Policy. JAI Press, 1992, pp. 51-91
  • Kane, Edward J. "How Incentive-Incompatible Deposit-Insurance Funds Fail," Research in Financial Services, 1992, v4(1), 51-92.

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Kane and Demirguc-Kunt w8493 Deposit Insurance Around the Globe: Where Does it Work?
Kane w2317 No Room for Weak Links in the Chain of Deposit Insurance Reform
Demirguc-Kunt, Kane, and Laeven w12862 Determinants of Deposit-Insurance Adoption and Design
Cecchetti and Krause w10908 Deposit Insurance and External Finance
Chung and Richardson w12594 Deposit Insurance and the Composition of Bank Suspensions in Developing Economies: Lessons from the State Deposit Insurance Experiments of the 1920S
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us