Firm-Level Risk Exposures and Stock Returns in the Wake of COVID-19
Firm-level stock returns differ enormously in reaction to COVID-19 news. We characterize these reactions using the Risk Factors discussions in pre-pandemic 10-K filings and two text-analytic approaches: expert-curated dictionaries and supervised machine learning (ML). Bad COVID-19 news lowers returns for firms with high exposures to travel, traditional retail, aircraft production and energy supply -- directly and via downstream demand linkages -- and raises them for firms with high exposures to healthcare policy, e-commerce, web services, drug trials and materials that feed into supply chains for semiconductors, cloud computing and telecommunications. Monetary and fiscal policy responses to the pandemic strongly impact firm-level returns as well, but differently than pandemic news. Despite methodological differences, dictionary and ML approaches yield remarkably congruent return predictions. Importantly though, ML operates on a vastly larger feature space, yielding richer characterizations of risk exposures and outperforming the dictionary approach in goodness-of-fit. By integrating elements of both approaches, we uncover new risk factors and sharpen our explanations for firm-level returns. To illustrate the broader utility of our methods, we also apply them to explain firm-level returns in reaction to the March 2020 Super Tuesday election results.
We thank the Becker Friedman Institute for Research in Economics for financial assistance. Davis also thanks the U.S. National Science Foundation (SES 1324257). Hansen gratefully acknowledges financial support from the European Research Council (Consolidator Grant 864863). The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Steven J. Davis
I own more than $5,000 in stock of Charles River Associates. I own Millennium Economics LLC.