NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
loading...

Do Discrete Choice Approaches to Valuing Urban Amenities Yield Different Results Than Hedonic Models?

Paramita Sinha, Martha L. Caulkins, Maureen L. Cropper

NBER Working Paper No. 24290
Issued in February 2018, Revised in September 2019
NBER Program(s):The Environment and Energy Program

Amenities that vary across cities are typically valued using either a hedonic model, in which amenities are capitalized into wages and housing prices, or a discrete model of household location choice. In this paper, we use the 2000 Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) to value climate amenities using both methods. We compare estimates of marginal willingness to pay (MWTP), allowing preferences for climate amenities to vary by location. We find that mean MWTP for warmer winters is about twice as large using the discrete choice approach as with the hedonic approach; mean MWTP for cooler summers is approximately the same. The two approaches differ, however, in their estimates of taste sorting. The discrete choice model implies that households with the highest MWTP for warmer winters locate in cities with the mildest winters, while the hedonic model does not. Differences in estimates are due to primarily to two factors: (1) the discrete choice model incorporates the psychological costs of moving from one’s birthplace, which the hedonic models do not; (2) the discrete choice model uses information on market shares (i.e., population) in estimating parameters, which the hedonic model does not.

download in pdf format
   (1402 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w24290

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Eggertsson, Robbins, and Wold w24287 Kaldor and Piketty’s Facts: The Rise of Monopoly Power in the United States
Fryer w24238 Reconciling Results on Racial Differences in Police Shootings
Dragusanu and Nunn w24260 The Effects of Fair Trade Certification: Evidence from Coffee Producers in Costa Rica
Saez w7708 Optimal Income Transfer Programs: Intensive Versus Extensive Labor Supply Responses
Horton and Zeckhauser w22029 Owning, Using and Renting: Some Simple Economics of the "Sharing Economy"
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Themes
Data
People
About

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us