The Distributional Effects of Building Energy Codes

Christopher D. Bruegge, Tatyana Deryugina, Erica Myers

NBER Working Paper No. 24211
Issued in January 2018
NBER Program(s):The Environment and Energy Program

State-level building energy codes have been around for over 40 years, but recent empirical research has cast doubt on their effectiveness. A potential virtue of standards-based policies is that they may be less regressive than explicit taxes on energy consumption. However, this conjecture has not been tested empirically in the case of building energy codes. Using spatial variation in California’s code strictness created by building climate zones, combined with information on over 350,000 homes located within 3 kilometers of climate zone borders, we evaluate the effect of building energy codes on home characteristics, energy use, and home value. We also study building energy codes’ distributional burdens. Our key findings are that stricter codes create a non-trivial reduction in homes’ square footage and the number of bedrooms at the lower end of the income distribution. On a per-dwelling basis, we observe energy use reductions only in the second lowest income quintile, and energy use per square foot actually increases in the bottom quintile. Home values of lower-income households fall, while those of high-income households rise. We interpret these results as evidence that building energy codes result in more distortions for lower-income households and that decreases in square footage are responsible for much of the code-induced energy savings.

download in pdf format
   (4658 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w24211


Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Butcher and Piehl w13229 Why are Immigrants' Incarceration Rates so Low? Evidence on Selective Immigration, Deterrence, and Deportation
Heutel, Miller, and Molitor w23271 Adaptation and the Mortality Effects of Temperature Across U.S. Climate Regions
Bertrand and Mullainathan w9873 Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination
Gendron-Carrier, Gonzalez-Navarro, Polloni, and Turner w24183 Subways and Urban Air Pollution
Nevo and Wong w21318 The Elasticity of Substitution Between Time and Market Goods: Evidence from the Great Recession
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us