Investing in Schools: Capital Spending, Facility Conditions, and Student Achievement
Public investments in repairs, modernization, and construction of schools cost billions. However, little is known about the nature of school facility investments, whether it actually changes the physical condition of public schools, and the subsequent causal impacts on student achievement. We study the achievement effects of nearly 1,400 capital campaigns initiated and financed by local school districts, comparing districts where school capital bonds were either narrowly approved or defeated by district voters. Overall, we find little evidence that school capital campaigns improve student achievement. Our event-study analyses focusing on students that attend targeted schools and therefore exposed to major campus renovations also generate very precise zero estimates of achievement effects. Thus, locally financed school capital campaigns – the predominant method through which facility investments are made – may represent a limited tool for realizing substantial gains in student achievement or closing achievement gaps.
-
-
Copy CitationPaco Martorell, Kevin M. Stange, and Isaac McFarlin, "Investing in Schools: Capital Spending, Facility Conditions, and Student Achievement," NBER Working Paper 21515 (2015), https://doi.org/10.3386/w21515.
-
Published Versions
Paco Martorell & Kevin Stange & Isaac McFarlin, 2016. "Investing in schools: Capital spending, facility conditions, and student achievement," Journal of Public Economics, . citation courtesy of 
Related
Mentioned in the News
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
