Are Closely-Held Firms Tax Shelters?

Annette Alstadsæter, Wojciech Kopczuk, Kjetil Telle

NBER Working Paper No. 19609
Issued in November 2013
NBER Program(s):Corporate Finance, Public Economics

In 2004 Norwegian authorities announced a reform introducing dividend taxation for personal (but not corporate) owners to take effect starting in 2006. This change provided incentives to maximize dividends in 2004 and 2005, and to retain earnings in the following years. Using Norwegian registry data that cover the universe of non-publicly traded firms, we find that dividend payments responded very strongly to the anticipated reform, but also that much of the response was compensated by re-injecting shareholder equity in the same firms. On the other hand, following the reform firms began to retain earnings. While all categories of assets grow, the increase in durable assets categories that include equipment, machinery, company cars, planes and boats, is particularly striking. We find that personally owned firms and those that pursued aggressive dividend maximization policy in anticipation of the reform exhibit lower profits and economic activity in its aftermath, but retain earnings and accumulated assets at comparable or faster rate than others. The differential effect on assets is concentrated in financial (a potential substitute for private saving) and durable (a potential substitute for private consumption) asset categories.We interpret these results as indicating both the existence of real tax responses and supportive of the notion that in the presence of dividend taxation closely-held firms partially serve as tax shelters.

download in pdf format
   (353 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w19609

Published: Are Closely Held Firms Tax Shelters?, Annette Alstadsæter, Wojciech Kopczuk, Kjetil Telle. in Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 28, Brown. 2014

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Markle and Shackelford w19621 The Impact of Headquarter and Subsidiary Locations on Multinationals' Effective Tax Rates
Goryunov, Kazakova, Kotlikoff, Mamedov, Nesterova, Nazarov, Grishina, Trunin, and Shpenev w19608 Russia's Fiscal Gap
Hallsworth, List, Metcalfe, and Vlaev w20007 The Behavioralist As Tax Collector: Using Natural Field Experiments to Enhance Tax Compliance
Borek, Frattarelli, and Hart w19081 Tax Shelters or Efficient Tax Planning? A Theory of The Firm Perspective On the Economic Substance Doctrine
Seo and Wachter w19611 Option Prices in a Model with Stochastic Disaster Risk
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us