Improving the Targeting of Treatment: Evidence from College Remediation

Judith Scott-Clayton, Peter M. Crosta, Clive R. Belfield

NBER Working Paper No. 18457
Issued in October 2012
NBER Program(s):Economics of Education

At an annual cost of roughly $7 billion nationally, remedial coursework is one of the single largest interventions intended to improve outcomes for underprepared college students. But like a costly medical treatment with non-trivial side effects, the value of remediation overall depends upon whether those most likely to benefit can be identified in advance. Our analysis uses administrative data and a rich predictive model to examine the accuracy of remedial screening tests, either instead of or in addition to using high school transcript data to determine remedial assignment. We find that roughly one in four test-takers in math and one in three test-takers in English are severely mis-assigned under current test-based policies, with mis-assignments to remediation much more common than mis-assignments to college-level coursework. We find that using high school transcript information--either instead of or in addition to test scores--could significantly reduce the prevalence of assignment errors. Further, we find that the choice of screening device has significant implications for the racial and gender composition of both remedial and college-level courses. Finally, we find that if institutions took account of students' high school performance, they could remediate substantially fewer students without lowering success rates in college-level courses.

download in pdf format
   (343 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w18457

Published: Improving the Targeting of Treatment Evidence From College Remediation Judith Scott-Clayton Peter M. Crosta Teachers College, Columbia University Clive R. Belfield The City University of New York Published online before print January 28, 2014, doi: 10.3102/0162373713517935 EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS September 2014 vol. 36 no. 3 371-393

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Bettinger and Long w11325 Addressing the Needs of Under-Prepared Students in Higher Education: Does College Remediation Work?
Calcagno and Long w14194 The Impact of Postsecondary Remediation Using a Regression Discontinuity Approach: Addressing Endogenous Sorting and Noncompliance
Scott-Clayton and Rodriguez w18328 Development, Discouragement, or Diversion? New Evidence on the Effects of College Remediation
Bettinger and Long w10369 Shape Up or Ship Out: The Effects of Remediation on Students at Four-Year Colleges
Page and Scott-Clayton w21781 Improving College Access in the United States: Barriers and Policy Responses
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us