Cephalon, Inc. Taking Risk Management Theory Seriously

George Chacko, Peter Tufano, Geoffrey Verter

NBER Working Paper No. 7748
Issued in June 2000
NBER Program(s):Corporate Finance

We study a firm that justifies its novel use of equity derivatives as a cash-flow hedging strategy. Our purpose is to understand the challenge of translating risk management theory into managerial action. Cephalon Inc., a biotech firm, bought a large block of call options on its own stock. If the FDA approved the firm's new drug, the firm would have large cash needs, which the options were designed to meet. We analyze this stated rationale for the firm's choice, applying the cash flow hedging concepts articulated by Froot, Scharfstein and Stein (1993). In applying the theory to practice, there are lessons for both managers and theorists. Managers consider deadweight costs of financing and of risk management, whereas theory tends to ignore the latter costs. While theory is driven by costs of external financing, managers must measure these costs to arrive at decisions and this measurement problem is severe. Cephalon's risk management decisions seem motivated as much by fluctuations in the availability and cost of external financing and by accounting considerations as by fluctuations in operating cash flows or desired investment. Finally, even a field-based examination of this strategy cannot reject the conclusion that the transaction was motivated by goals other than risk management.

download in pdf format
   (356 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w7748

Published: Chacko, George, Peter Tufano and Geoffrey Verter. "Cephalon, Inc. Taking Risk Management Theory Seriously," Journal of Financial Economics, 2001, v60(2-3,May), 449-485.

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Romer It Takes a Regime Shift: Recent Developments in Japanese Monetary Policy through the Lens of the Great Depression
Draghi, Giavazzi, and Merton w9806 Transparency, Risk Management and International Financial Fragility
Kotchen and Grant w14429 Does Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Indiana
Rauh w13240 Risk Shifting versus Risk Management: Investment Policy in Corporate Pension Plans
Bordo, Humpage, and Schwartz w16647 U.S. Foreign-Exchange-Market Intervention and the Early Dollar Float: 1973 - 1981
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us