How Soon Is Now? Evidence of Present Bias from Convex Time Budget Experiments

Uttara Balakrishnan, Johannes Haushofer, Pamela Jakiela

NBER Working Paper No. 23558
Issued in June 2017
NBER Program(s):Development Economics

Empirically observed intertemporal choices about money have long been thought to exhibit present bias, i.e. higher short-term compared to long-term discount rates. Recently, this view has been called into question on both empirical and theoretical grounds, and a spate of recent findings suggest that present bias for money is minimal or non-existent when one allows for curvature in the utility function and transaction costs are tightly controlled. However, an alternative interpretation of many of these findings is that, in the interest of equalizing transaction costs across earlier and later payments, small delays were introduced between the time of the experiment and the soonest payment. We conduct a laboratory experiment in Kenya in which we elicit time and risk preference parameters from 494 participants, using convex time budgets and tightly controlling for transaction costs. We vary whether same-day payments are made immediately after the experimental session or at the close of the business day. Using the Kenyan mobile money system M-Pesa to make real-time transfers to subjects' phones allows us to make the soonest payments truly immediate. We find strong evidence of present bias, with estimates of the present bias parameter ranging from 0.902 to 0.924 — but only when same-day payments are made immediately after the experiment. This result suggests that present bias for money does in fact exist, but only for truly immediate payments.

download in pdf format
   (531 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w23558

Published: Uttara Balakrishnan & Johannes Haushofer & Pamela Jakiela, 2020. "How soon is now? Evidence of present bias from convex time budget experiments," Experimental Economics, vol 23(2), pages 294-321. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Karlan and Linden w19863 Loose Knots: Strong versus Weak Commitments to Save for Education in Uganda
Beshears, Choi, Harris, Laibson, Madrian, and Sakong w21474 Self Control and Commitment: Can Decreasing the Liquidity of a Savings Account Increase Deposits?
Abaluck and Adams w23566 What Do Consumers Consider Before They Choose? Identification from Asymmetric Demand Responses
Rodrik w23559 Populism and the Economics of Globalization
García, Heckman, and Ziff w23412 Gender Differences in the Benefits of an Influential Early Childhood Program
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us