Greenhouse Gas Reductions under Low Carbon Fuel Standards?

Stephen P. Holland, Christopher R. Knittel, Jonathan E. Hughes

NBER Working Paper No. 13266
Issued in July 2007
NBER Program(s):Environment and Energy Economics, Industrial Organization

A low carbon fuel standard (LCFS) seeks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by limiting a fuel producer's carbon emissions per unit of output. California has launched an LCFS for transportation fuels; others have called for a national LCFS. We show that this policy decreases production of high-carbon fuels but increases production of low-carbon fuels. The net effect of this may be an increase in carbon emissions. The LCFS cannot be first best, and the best LCFS may reduce social welfare. We simulate the outcomes of a national LCFS, focusing on gasoline and ethanol as the high- and low-carbon fuels. For a broad range of parameters, we find that the LCFS is unlikely to increase CO2 emissions. However, the surplus losses from the LCFS are likely to be quite large ($80 to $760 billion annually for a national LCFS reducing carbon intensities by 10 percent), energy prices are likely to increase, and the average carbon cost ($307 to $2,272 per ton of CO2 for the same LCFS) can be much larger than damage estimates. We describe an efficient policy that achieves the same emissions reduction at a much lower surplus cost ($16 to $290 billion) and much lower average carbon cost ($60 to $868 per ton of CO2).

download in pdf format
   (380 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w13266

Published: Stephen P. Holland & Jonathan E. Hughes & Christopher R. Knittel, 2009. "Greenhouse Gas Reductions under Low Carbon Fuel Standards?," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 1(1), pages 106-46, February. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Metcalf w15054 Tax Policies for Low-Carbon Technologies
Holland w15262 Taxes and Trading versus Intensity Standards: Second-Best Environmental Policies with Incomplete Regulation (Leakage) or Market Power
Goldberg w5673 The Effects of the Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency Standards
Dong and Whalley w14431 Carbon, Trade Policy, and Carbon Free Trade Areas
Holland, Hughes, Knittel, and Parker w17386 Some Inconvenient Truths About Climate Change Policy: The Distributional Impacts of Transportation Policies
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us