This paper forms part of the National Bureau of Economic Research’s International Social Security (ISS) Project, which is supported by the National Institute on Aging (grant P01 AG012810). The research in this paper was funded by the ESRC Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Public Policy at IFS (grant number RES-544-28-5001).
Carl Emmerson
Over the last three years, I have also received other research grants, which were not directly related to the work on which the article is based, from the following potentially interested parties:
• Age UK
• Arnold Foundation
• Association of British Insurers
• Chartered Insurance Institute
• Department for Work and Pensions
• Economic and Social Research Council
• Health Foundation
• HM Revenue and Customs
• HM Treasury
• Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales
• Investment Association
• Legal and General Investment Management
• Money Advice Service
• Nuffield Foundation
• Tax Incentivised Savings Association
I am also a member of the United Kingdom’s Social Security Advisory Committee, which is an advisory non-departmental body sponsored by the Department for Work and Pensions. This is involves scrutinising most of the secondary legislation that underpins the social security system and providing impartial advice on social security and related matters.
Gemma Tetlow
Over the last three years I have also received financial support from the following organisations, who potentially have an interest in this research summarized in this working paper, although they did not directly fund it: Age UK, Association of British Insurers, Chartered Insurance Institute, Department for Work and Pensions, Economic and Social Research Council, Health Foundation, HM Revenue and Customs, HM Treasury, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, Investment Association, Legal and General Investment Management, Money Advice Service, Nuffield Foundation, Tax Incentivised Savings Association.