Quantifying Heterogeneous Returns to Genetic Selection: Evidence from Wisconsin Dairies
Estimates of productivity growth in the dairy sector attribute as much as half of observedgrowth to genetic improvement. However, productivity can be over-attributed to the quality ofthe genetics instead of the skill of the farmer in selecting them when models ignore selectionbias in the dairy cow production function. Our work decomposes total productivity changeon Wisconsin dairy farms due to genetics into separate effects for genetic improvement andendogenous selection. Using data from a large sample of Wisconsin dairy farms and national-level data on dairy sire rankings, we develop and estimate a model that accounts for selectionbehavior in the animal’s production function. We find that selection accounts for as much as 75percent of the total productivity improvement in our sample. Our results provide evidence forpositive assortative matching, whereby farmers who adopt above-average yield genetics alsoperform better than average for their chosen genetics. Overall, our results indicate that a largeportion of productivity growth in dairy farming can be explained by farmers’ ability to identifyand select genetics well suited to their production environment, and not solely the quality ofthe genetics they choose.
We are grateful for the feedback on preliminary versions of this research provided by researchers at the Animal Genetics Improvement Laboratory (AGIL) in the USDA and the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB). We also are grateful to the participants in the NBER Economics of Research and Innovation in Agriculture meeting in Washington DC on May 17, 2019, especially the insightful feedback and comments from our discussant Paul Scott. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.