Managerial Power and Rent Extraction in the Design of Executive Compensation

Lucian Arye Bebchuk, Jesse M. Fried, David I. Walker

NBER Working Paper No. 9068
Issued in July 2002
NBER Program(s):Corporate Finance, Labor Studies, Law and Economics

This paper develops an account of the role and significance of managerial power and rent extraction in executive compensation. Under the optimal contracting approach to executive compensation, which has dominated academic re-search on the subject, pay arrangements are set by a board of directors that aims to maximize shareholder value. In contrast, the managerial power approach suggests that boards do not operate at arm's length in devising executive compensation arrangements; rather, executives have power to influence their own pay, and they use that power to extract rents. Furthermore, the desire to camouflage rent extraction might lead to the use of inefficient pay arrangements that provide suboptimal incentives and thereby hurt shareholder value. The authors show that the processes that produce compensation arrangements, and the various market forces and constraints that act on these processes, leave managers with considerable power to shape their own pay arrangements. Examining the large body of empirical work on executive compensation, the authors show that managerial power and the desire to camouflage rents can explain significant features of the executive compensation landscape, including ones that have long been viewed as puzzling or problematic from the optimal contracting perspective. The authors conclude that the role managerial power plays in the design of executive compensation is significant and should be taken into account in any examination of executive pay arrangements or of corporate governance generally.

download in pdf format
   (905 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w9068

Published: Bebchuk, Lucian Arye, Jesse Fried and David Walker. “Managerial Power and Rent Extraction in the Design of Executive Compensation." University of Chicago Law Review 69 (2002): 751-846.

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Abowd and Kaplan w7124 Executive Compensation: Six Questions that Need Answering
Rose and Shepard w4723 Firm Diversification and CEO Compensation: Managerial Ability or Executive Entrenchment?
Hall and Murphy w9784 The Trouble with Stock Options
Hall and Liebman w6213 Are CEOs Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?
Bebchuk and Fried w9813 Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us