Identifying the Efficacy of Central Bank Interventions: The Australian Case

Jonathan Kearns, Roberto Rigobon

NBER Working Paper No. 9062
Issued in July 2002
NBER Program(s):International Finance and Macroeconomics, Monetary Economics

The endogeneity of exchange rates and intervention has long plagued studies of the effectiveness of central banks actions in foreign exchange markets. Researchers have either excluded contemporaneous intervention, so that their explanators are predetermined, or obtained a small, and typically incorrectly signed, coefficient on contemporaneous intervention. Failing to account for the endogeneity, when central banks lean against the wind and trade strategically, will likely result in a large downward bias to the coefficient on contemporaneous intervention -- explaining the negative coefficient frequently obtained. We use an alternative identification assumption, a change in Reserve Bank of Australia intervention policy, that allows us to estimate, using simulated GMM, a model that includes the contemporaneous impact of intervention. There are three main results. Our point estimates suggest that central bank intervention has a economically significant contemporaneous effect. A $US100m purchase of the domestic currency will appreciate the exchange rate by 1.35 to 1.81 per cent. This estimate is remarkably similar to the calibration conducted by Dominguez and Frankel (1993), who themselves noted their estimate was larger than previous empirical findings. Secondly, the vast majority of the effect of an intervention on the exchange rate is found to occur during the day in which it is conducted, with only a smaller impact on subsequent days. Finally, we confirm findings that Australian central bank intervention policy can be characterized by leaning aginst the wind.

download in pdf format
   (309 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w9062

Published: Kearns, Jonathan and Roberto Rigobon. "Identifying The Efficacy Of Central Bank Interventions: Evidence From Australia And Japan," Journal of International Economics, 2005, v66(1,May), 31-48.

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Dominguez w4532 Does Central Bank Intervention Increase the Volatility of Foreign Exchange Rates?
Ito and Yabu w10456 What Prompts Japan to Intervene in the Forex Market? A New Approach to a Reaction Function
Dominguez w7337 The Market Microstructure of Central Bank Intervention
Ito w8914 Is Foreign Exchange Intervention Effective?: The Japanese Experiences in the 1990s
Dominguez w9875 When Do Central Bank Interventions Influence Intra-Daily and Longer-Term Exchange Rate Movements?
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us