Risk Reduction in Large Portfolios: Why Imposing the Wrong Constraints Helps

Ravi Jagannathan, Tongshu Ma

NBER Working Paper No. 8922
Issued in May 2002
NBER Program(s):Asset Pricing

Mean-variance efficient portfolios constructed using sample moments often involve taking extreme long and short positions. Hence practitioners often impose portfolio weight constraints when constructing efficient portfolios. Green and Hollifield (1992) argue that the presence of a single dominant factor in the covariance matrix of returns is why we observe extreme positive and negative weights. If this were the case then imposing the weight constraint should hurt whereas the empirical evidence is often to the contrary. We reconcile this apparent contradiction. We show that constraining portfolio weights to be nonnegative is equivalent to using the sample covariance matrix after reducing its large elements and then form the optimal portfolio without any restrictions on portfolio weights. This shrinkage helps reduce the risk in estimated optimal portfolios even when they have negative weights in the population. Surprisingly, we also find that once the nonnegativity constraint is imposed, minimum variance portfolios constructed using the monthly sample covariance matrix perform as well as those constructed using covariance matrices estimated using factor models, shrinkage estimators, and daily data. When minimizing tracking error is the criterion, using daily data instead of monthly data helps. However, the sample covariance matrix without any correction for microstructure effects performs the best.

download in pdf format
   (470 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w8922

Published: Ravi Jagannathan & Tongshu Ma, 2003. "Risk Reduction in Large Portfolios: Why Imposing the Wrong Constraints Helps," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(4), pages 1651-1684, 08. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
MacKinlay and Pastor w7162 Asset Pricing Models: Implications for Expected Returns and Portfolio Selection
Brandt, Santa-Clara, and Valkanov w10996 Parametric Portfolio Policies: Exploiting Characteristics in the Cross Section of Equity Returns
Chan, Karceski, and Lakonishok w7039 On Portfolio Optimization: Forecasting Covariances and Choosing the Risk Model
Merton w0444 On Estimating the Expected Return on the Market: An Exploratory Investigation
Ang, Hodrick, Xing, and Zhang w10852 The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected Returns
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us