Why Are Superstar Firms the Best Places to Work? Competitive Advantage in Amenity Provision and the Declining Labor Share
Why are superstar firms the best places to work? We document that worker satisfaction scales nearly twice as fast as wages with firm size. Our assignment model distinguishes selection (talent sorting) from competitive advantage (amenity provision); amenity-cost advantages cause utility to rise more steeply than wages. Using Glassdoor data, competitive advantage explains roughly half of the utility increase with firm size. As workers increasingly value non-pecuniary amenities, superstar firms with a cost advantage substitute wages for amenities, raising profits and reducing the measured labor share all while raising worker utility. Declining labor shares need not signal deteriorating worker welfare.
-
-
Copy CitationIoannis Branikas, Briana Chang, Harrison Hong, and Nan Li, "Why Are Superstar Firms the Best Places to Work? Competitive Advantage in Amenity Provision and the Declining Labor Share," NBER Working Paper 33870 (2025), https://doi.org/10.3386/w33870.Download Citation
-
Related
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
