The Impact of Money in Politics on Labor and Capital: Evidence from Citizens United v. FEC
We examine whether corporate money in politics benefits or hurts labor using the 2010 Supreme Court ruling Citizens United, which rendered bans on political election spending unconstitutional. In difference-in-difference analyses, affected states experience increases in both capital and labor income relative to unaffected states. We find evidence consistent with increased political spending spurring political competition and the adoption of pro-growth policies. These policies benefit a broader set of constituents as we find a broad-based increase in labor income. Affected states see increased political turnover and reduced regulatory burdens. The economic effects are stronger among ex-ante politically inactive and younger firms.
-
-
Copy CitationPat Akey, Tania Babina, Greg Buchak, and Ana-Maria Tenekedjieva, "The Impact of Money in Politics on Labor and Capital: Evidence from Citizens United v. FEC," NBER Working Paper 31481 (2023), https://doi.org/10.3386/w31481.
Related
Topics
Mentioned in the News
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
