Beware the Side Effects: Capital Controls, Trade and Misallocation
Capital controls are an effective credit-management tool but they have serious side effects. Analyzing a dynamic Melitz-OLG model in which firms face credit constraints, we find that capital controls worsen misallocation and hurt exports. Misallocation worsens through static effects that lower capital-labor ratios and raise firm prices. In addition, changes in saving incentives induce dynamic effects and changes in wages, aggregate demand and the real exchange rate cause general equilibrium effects. A quantitative analysis calibrated to Chile’s capital controls of the 1990s yields a sizable worsening in misallocation, with stronger effects on firms that are exporters, more productive, or far from their optimal scales. Exports and the share of exporting firms fall sharply. Rebating the revenue that capital controls may generate or using loan-to-value regulation instead of capital controls results in sharply weaker effects, but slightly tighter capital controls strengthens them significantly. A set of empirical tests applied to Chilean firm-level data provide robust support for the model’s key predictions.
-
-
Copy CitationEugenia Andreasen, Sofía Bauducco, Evangelina Dardati, and Enrique G. Mendoza, "Beware the Side Effects: Capital Controls, Trade and Misallocation," NBER Working Paper 30963 (2023), https://doi.org/10.3386/w30963.Download Citation
-
-
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
