Mean Reversion in Stock Prices: Evidence and Implications

James M. Poterba, Lawrence H. Summers

NBER Working Paper No. 2343 (Also Reprint No. r1233)
Issued in August 1987
NBER Program(s):Monetary Economics, Public Economics

This paper analyzes the statistical evidence bearing on whether transitory components account for a large fraction of the variance in common stock returns. The first part treats methodological issues involved in testing for transitory return components. It demonstrates that variance ratios are among the most powerful tests for detecting mean reversion in stock prices, but that they have little power against the principal interesting alternatives to the random walk hypothesis. The second part applies variance ratio tests to market returns for the United States over the 1871-1986 period and for seventeen other countries over the 1957-1985 period, as well as to returns on individual firms over the 1926- 1985 period. We find consistent evidence that stock returns are positively serially correlated over short horizons, and negatively autocorrelated over long horizons. The point estimates suggest that the transitory components in stock prices have a standard deviation of between 15 and 25 percent and account for more than half of the variance in monthly returns. The last part of the paper discusses two possible explanations for mean reversion: time varying required returns, and slowly-decaying "price fads" that cause stock prices to deviate from fundamental values for periods of several years. We conclude that explaining observed transitory components in stock prices on the basis of movements in required returns due to risk factors is likely to be difficult.

download in pdf format
   (287 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w2343

Published: "Mean Reversion in Stock Prices." From Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 22, pp. 27-59, (1988). citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Lo and MacKinlay w2168 Stock Market Prices Do Not Follow Random Walks: Evidence From a Simple Specification Test
Shiller and Perron t0045 Testing the Random Walk Hypothesis: Power versus Frequency of Observation
Kim, Nelson, and Startz w2795 Mean Reversion in Stock Prices? A Reappraisal of the Empirical Evidence
Shiller w0456 Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Dividends?
Schwert w9277 Anomalies and Market Efficiency
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us