NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
loading...

The Effect of Post-and-Hold Laws on Alcohol Consumption

Henry Saffer, Markus Gehrsitz

NBER Working Paper No. 21367
Issued in July 2015
NBER Program(s):The Health Economics Program

This paper estimates the effects of post-and-hold laws on alcohol consumption and price. Post-and-hold laws require alcohol wholesalers to provide a list of prices to the state, which can be reviewed by retailers, competitors and the public. These laws were generally enacted at the end of prohibition with the intention of limiting alcohol consumption by raising prices. The laws may also have the unintended consequence of protecting small retailers. Recently, several large retailers have argued in court that these laws are counter to the Sherman Act, which limits anti-competitive behavior. This paper follows the recent paper by Cooper and Wright (2012) and adds new data and new statistical tests. Both difference-in–difference models and synthetic control models are employed. The estimation results provide no persuasive evidence of an effect of post-and-hold laws on the consumption of either beer, wine, or spirits. There is also no persuasive evidence that the laws increase the prices of these products. One possible explanation of this null effect is that the wholesale markets for alcohol are so highly regulated that post-and-hold laws have no discernable marginal effect. The empirical results presented in this paper do support alcohol excise taxes as effective means of reducing alcohol consumption.

download in pdf format
   (358 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w21367

Published: Saffer, Henry & Gehrsitz, Markus, 2016. "The effect of post-and-hold laws on alcohol consumption," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 63-71. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Powell, Pacula, and Jacobson w21345 Do Medical Marijuana Laws Reduce Addictions and Deaths Related to Pain Killers?
Saffer, Dave, and Grossman w18180 Behavioral Economics and the Demand for Alcohol: Results from the NLSY97
Stiglitz w21327 The Measurement of Wealth: Recessions, Sustainability and Inequality
DeCicca and Krashinsky w21594 Does Education Reduce Teen Fertility? Evidence from Compulsory Schooling Laws
Gabaix, Lasry, Lions, and Moll w21363 The Dynamics of Inequality
 
Publications
Activities
Meetings
NBER Videos
Themes
Data
People
About

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email: info@nber.org

Contact Us