The Hidden Benefits of Control: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment

Craig E. Landry, Andreas Lange, John A. List, Michael K. Price, Nicholas G. Rupp

NBER Working Paper No. 17473
Issued in September 2011
NBER Program(s):Environment and Energy Economics, Public Economics

An important dialogue between theorists and experimentalists over the past few decades has raised the study of the interaction of psychological and economic incentives from academic curiosity to a bona fide academic field. One recent area of study within this genre that has sparked interest and debate revolves around the "hidden costs" of conditional incentives. This study overlays randomization on a naturally-occurring environment in a series of temporally-linked field experiments to advance our understanding of the economics of charity and test if such "costs" exist in the field. This approach permits us to examine why people initially give to charities, and what factors keep them committed to the cause. Several key findings emerge. First, there are hidden benefits of conditional incentives that would have gone undetected had we maintained a static theory and an experimental design that focused on short run substitution effects rather than dynamic interactions. Second, we can reject the pure altruism model of giving. Third, we find that public good provision is maximized in both the short and long run by using conditional, rather than unconditional, incentives.

download in pdf format
   (420 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w17473

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Landry, Lange, List, Price, and Rupp w17472 Is There a 'Hidden Cost of Control' in Naturally-Occurring Markets? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
Lefgren, Platt, and Price w17477 Sticking with What (Barely) Worked
Bartel, Phibbs, Beaulieu, and Stone w17474 Human Capital and Organizational Performance: Evidence from the Healthcare Sector
Al-Ubaydli and List w17957 On the Generalizability of Experimental Results in Economics
Landry, Lange, List, Price, and Rupp w14319 Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us