The U.S. Left Behind: The Rise of IPO Activity Around the World

Craig Doidge, G. Andrew Karolyi, René M. Stulz

NBER Working Paper No. 16916
Issued in March 2011
NBER Program(s):Corporate Finance, International Finance and Macroeconomics

During the past two decades, there has been a dramatic change in IPO activity around the world. Though vibrant IPO activity, attributed to better institutions and governance, used to be a strength of the U.S., it no longer is. IPO activity in the U.S. has fallen compared to the rest of the world and U.S. firms go public less than expected based on the economic importance of the U.S. In the early 1990s, the declining U.S. IPO share was due to the extraordinary growth of IPOs in foreign countries; in the 2000s, however, it is due to higher IPO activity abroad combined with lower IPO activity in the U.S. Global IPOs, which are IPOs in which some of the proceeds are raised outside the firm's home country, play a critical role in the increase in IPO activity outside the U.S. The quality of a country's institutions is positively related to its domestic IPO activity and negatively related to its global IPO activity. However, home country institutions are more important in explaining IPO activity in the 1990s than in the 2000s. The evidence is consistent with the view that access to global markets helps firms overcome the obstacles of poor institutions. Finally, we show that the dynamics of global IPO activity and country-level IPO activity are strongly affected by global factors.

download in pdf format
   (520 K)

email paper

A non-technical summary of this paper is available in the August 2011 NBER Digest.  You can sign up to receive the NBER Digest by email.

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w16916

Published: “The U.S. left behind? Financial globalization and the rise of IPOs outside the U.S.,” with Craig Doidge and G. Andrew Karolyi, Journal of Financial Economics, 2013, v110(3), 546-573.

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Ritter and Welch w8805 A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations
Jagannathan, Jirnyi, and Sherman w16214 Why Don't Issuers Choose IPO Auctions? The Complexity of Indirect Mechanisms
Hellmann and Wasserman w16922 The First Deal: The Division of Founder Equity in New Ventures
Pastor, Taylor, and Veronesi w12792 Entrepreneurial Learning, the IPO Decision, and the Post-IPO Drop in Firm Profitability
Bloom, Draca, and Van Reenen w16717 Trade Induced Technical Change? The Impact of Chinese Imports on Innovation, IT and Productivity
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us