Sovereign Debt as a Contingent Claim: Excusable Default, Repudiation, and Reputation

Herschel I. Grossman, John B. Van Huyck

NBER Working Paper No. 1673 (Also Reprint No. r1244)
Issued in July 1985
NBER Program(s):Monetary Economics, Economic Fluctuations and Growth

History suggests the following stylized facts about default on sovereign debt:(1) Defaults are associated with identifiably bad states of the world. (2) Defaults are usually partial, rather than complete.(3) Sovereign states usually are able to borrow again soon after a default. Motivated by these facts, this paper analyses a reputational equilibrium in a model that interprets sovereign debts as contingent claims that both finance investments and facilitate risk shifting. Loans are a useful device to facilitate risk shifting because they permit the prepayment of indemnities. Nevertheless, because the power to abrogate commitments without having to answer to a higher enforcement authority is an essential aspect of sovereignty, a decision by a sovereign to validate lender expectations about debt servicing depends on the sovereign's concern for its trust worthy reputation. A trustworthy reputationis valuable because it provides continued access to loans. A key aspect of the analysis is that lenders differentiate excusable default, which is associated with implicitly understood contingencies, from unjustifiable repudiation. In the reputational equilibrium, the short-run benefits from repudiation are smaller than the long-run costs from loss of a trustworthy reputation. Thus, although sovereigns sometimes excusably default, they never repudiate their debts. The reputational equilibrium can involve efficient risk shifting and efficient investment or it can involve a binding lending ceiling that limits risk shifting and can also restrict investment. The factors that tend to produce a binding lending ceiling include a high time discount rate for the sovereign, low-risk aversion forthe sovereign, and a low net return from the sovereign's investments.

download in pdf format
   (174 K)

download in djvu format
   (134 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w1673

Published: The American Economic Review, Vol. 78, No. 5, pp. 1088-1097, (December 1988). citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Eaton and Fernández w5131 Sovereign Debt
Bulow and Rogoff w2088 A Constant Recontracting Model of Sovereign Debt
Bulow and Rogoff w2623 Sovereign Debt: Is To Forgive To Forget?
Lindert and Morton How Sovereign Debt Has Worked
Tomz and Wright w18855 Empirical Research on Sovereign Debt and Default
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us