Black Box Warnings and Drug Safety: Examining the Determinants and Timing of FDA Warning Labels

Allan Begosh, John Goldsmith, Ed Hass, Randall W. Lutter, Clark Nardinelli, John A. Vernon

NBER Working Paper No. 12803
Issued in December 2006
NBER Program(s):Health Care Program, Health Economics Program, Law and Economics Program

Comparing the safety of prescription drugs over time is difficult due to the paucity of reliable quantitative measures of drug safety. Both the academic literature and popular press have focused on drug withdrawals as a proxy for breakdowns in the drug safety system. This metric, however, is problematic because withdrawals are rare events, and they may be influenced by factors beyond a drug's safety profile. In the current paper, we propose a new measure: the incidence and timing of Black Box Warnings (BBWs). BBWs are warnings placed on prescription drug labels when a drug is determined to carry a significant risk of a serious or life-threatening adverse event. Using a unique data set, one that includes all new molecular entities (NMEs) submitted to the FDA between May 1981 and February 2006, and subsequently approved and marketed, we analyze the timing and incidence of BBWs. Our analyses also use data on several drug characteristics likely to affect the probability a new drug will receive a BBW. We draw several conclusions from our analyses. For example, drugs receiving priority FDA review are more likely to have BBWs at the time of approval than NMEs receiving standard review. We also find that early prescription volume and orphan drug status are associated with an increased likelihood of receiving a BBW. We do not, however, find a significant difference in the rate of BBWs across time cohorts. A comparison of NMEs approved before and after the 1992 Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), which authorized the payment of user fees from drug manufacturers to the FDA in an effort to expedite new drug application (NDAs) review times, did not reveal a statistically significant difference in the rate of BBWs. Critics of PDUFA maintain that reduced FDA-approval times under PDUFA have compromised drug safety. We do not find empirical support for this contention.

download in pdf format
   (156 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w12803

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Philipson and Sun w13561 Is the Food and Drug Administration Safe and Effective?
Philipson, Sun, and Goldman w15603 The Effects of Product Liability Exemption in the Presence of the FDA
Philipson, Berndt, Gottschalk, and Strobeck w11724 Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of the FDA: The Case of the Prescription Drug User Fee Acts
Berndt, Gottschalk, Philipson, and Strobeck w10822 Assessing the Impacts of the Prescription Drug User Fee Acts (PDUFA) on the FDA Approval Process
Golec and Vernon w14932 What's the "Interest" in FDA Drug Advisory Committee Conflicts of Interest?
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us