Evaluating the Differential Effects of Alternative Welfare-to-Work Training Components: A Re-Analysis of the California GAIN Program

V. Joseph Hotz, Guido W. Imbens, Jacob A. Klerman

NBER Working Paper No. 11939
Issued in January 2006
NBER Program(s):Labor Studies

In this paper, we explore ways of combining experimental data and non-experimental methods to estimate the differential effects of components of training programs. We show how data from a multi-site experimental evaluation in which subjects are randomly assigned to any treatment versus a control group who receives no treatment can be combined with non-experimental regression-adjustment methods to estimate the differential effects of particular types of treatments. We also devise tests of the validity of using the latter methods. We use these methods and tests to re-analyze data from the MDRC Evaluation of California’s Greater Avenues to Independence (GAIN) program. While not designed to estimate the differential effects of the Labor Force Attachment (LFA) training and Human Capital Development (HCD) training components used in this program, we show how data from this experimental evaluation can be used in conjunction with non-experimental methods to estimate such effects. We present estimates of both the short- and long-term differential effects of these two training components on employment and earnings. We find that while there are short-term positive differential effects of LFA versus HCD, the latter training component is relatively more beneficial in the longer-term.

download in pdf format
   (466 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w11939

Published: Hotz, V. Joseph, Guido W. Imbens and Jacob A. Klerman. "Evaluating The Differential Effects Of Alternative Welfare-to-Work Training Components: A Reanalysis Of The California GAIN Program," Journal of Labor Economics, 2006, v24(3,Jul), 521-566. citation courtesy of

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Hotz, Imbens, and Klerman w8007 The Long-Term Gains from GAIN: A Re-Analysis of the Impacts of the California GAIN Program
Heckman and Smith w9818 The Determinants of Participation in a Social Program: Evidence from a Prototypical Job Training Program
Blank w8983 Evaluating Welfare Reform in the United States
Hotz, Imbens, and Mortimer t0238 Predicting the Efficacy of Future Training Programs Using Past Experiences
Imbens and Wooldridge w14251 Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us