A Comparison of Methodologies in Empirical General Equilibrium Models of Taxation

Don Fullerton, Yolanda K. Henderson, John B. Shoven

NBER Working Paper No. 911 (Also Reprint No. r0506)
Issued in June 1982
NBER Program(s):Public Economics

Computational general equilibrium models have proven useful in the area of long run analysis of alternative tax policies. A sizable number of studies have been completed which examine policies such as a value-added tax, corporate and personal income tax integration, a consumption or expenditure tax, housing subsidies, and inflation indexation.. This paper reviews the methodologies used in these models. We focus on eight specific models and review in turn: levels of disaggregation, specification of the foreign sector, financial modeling, the measurement of effective tax rates, heterogeneity and imperfect mobility, factor supply, treatment of the government budget, and technical issues associated with implementation. The paper includes some new experiments in connection with simulations of integration of the personal and corporate income tax systems in the United States. We compare the resulting welfare gains in models with different levels of disaggregation, and we discuss alternative justifications for specific disaggregations. We also examine the sensitivity of results to alternative specifications of households' endowments of labor and leisure. Our survey underscores the importance of the assumed elasticities of labor supply with respect to the net of tax wage, and of saving with respect to the net of tax rate of return. Unfortunately, these are also parameters for which there is not a consensus in the economics profession. The survey finds that there are several aspects of modeling that are especially ripe for further progress: the roles of government and business financial decisions, the dynamics of a life-cycle approach, and the measurement of incentive tax and transfer rates.

download in pdf format
   (590 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w0911

Published: Fullerton, Don, Yolanda K. Henderson, John B. Shoven. "A Comparison of Methodologies in Empirical General Equilibrium Models of Taxation." Applied General Equilibrium Analysis, edited by Herbert Scarf and John B. Shoven, pp. 367-410. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (1984).

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Ballard, Scholz, and Shoven The Value-Added Tax: A General Equilibrium Look at Its Efficiency and Incidence
King and Fullerton w1073 The Taxation of Income from Capital: A Comparative Study of the U.S., U.K., Sweden and West Germany--Comparisons of Effective Tax Rates--
Fullerton, Shoven, and Whalley w0892 Replacing the U.S. Income Tax with a Progressive Consumption Tax: A Sequenced General Equilibrium Approach
Gordon and Li Puzzling Tax Structures in Devloping Countries: A Comparison of Two Alternative Explanations
Bernheim and Rangel w11518 Behavioral Public Economics: Welfare and Policy Analysis with Non-Standard Decision-Makers
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us