Utilitarianism and Horizontal Equity: The Case for Random Taxation
This paper establishes that, far from being able to derive the principle of horizontal equity from utilitarianism, the principle is actually in- consistent with utilitarianism in a variety of circumstances. We derive conditions under which (a) it is optimal to impose random tax schedules (ex post randomization) ; and (b) it is optimal to randomize the tax schedules imposed on a set of otherwise identical individuals (ex ante randomization). The implications for optimal tax theory are discussed. More generally, it is shown that there are a number of potentially important economic situations with which the principle of horizontal equity may be inconsistent not only with utilitarianism but even with Pareto optimality.
-
-
Copy CitationJoseph E. Stiglitz, "Utilitarianism and Horizontal Equity: The Case for Random Taxation," NBER Working Paper 0694 (1981), https://doi.org/10.3386/w0694.
Published Versions
Stiglitz, Joseph E. "Utilitarianism and Horizontal Equity: The Case for Random Taxation." Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 18, No. 1 (June 1982) pp. 1-33. citation courtesy of