Summary

Addressing the Challenges of Globalization in National Accounts
Author(s):
Brent Moulton, Bureau of Economic Analysis, retired
Discussant(s):
Marshall Reinsdorf, International Monetary Fund
Who Owns Europe’s Firms? Foreign Investment in Europe and Implications for Risk Sharing
Author(s):
Ṣebnem Kalemli-Özcan, University of Maryland and NBER
Bent Sorensen, University of Houston
Carolina Villegas-Sanchez, ESADE Business School
Vadym Volosovych, Erasmus University Rotterdam
Discussant(s):
Nitya Pandalai-Nayar, University of Texas at Austin and NBER
Summary:

Kalemli-Ozcan, Sorensen, Villegas-Sanchez, and Volosovych investigate foreign direct investment (FDI) in 24 OECD and 13 non-OECD European countries, using a firm-level dataset for the years 1999-2012. Their data set is bilateral at the micro-level -- that is, for each firm, they observe the amount of foreign equity investment over time, together with the identity of direct and ultimate foreign investors. They aggregate their firm-level foreign direct investment data according to destination and origin country and compare to the aggregate FDI statistics from OECD and the IMF. The researchers find these official statistics overstate "real" FDI and these statistics also do not identify the countries of the ultimate investors correctly. Their "aggregated" micro data shows much lower and stable levels of FDI. They also find that, their aggregated data assigns a significant portion of within Europe FDI to North America so that American and Canadian investors are the ultimate foreign investors. These findings have implications in terms of risk sharing both within Europe and between Europe and the rest of the world.

Downloads:
Capturing International R&D Trade and Financing Flows: What Do Available Sources Reveal about the Structure of Knowledge-Based Global Production?
Author(s):
Francisco Moris, National Science Foundation
John Jankowski, Social Security Administration
Discussant(s):
Nune Hovhannisyan, Loyola University Maryland
Summary:

Galindo-Rueda, Ker, Moris, and Jankowski investigate available statistical evidence for OECD countries on the extent and nature of R&D globalisation based on three inter-related domains: services trade, activities of multinational enterprises (MNEs) and R&D performance and funding. This paper presents a first broad-ranging view on R&D globalisation measurement based on new or recently updated international statistics manuals across the three statistical domains, highlighting the major conceptual and practical implications arising from the methodological changes. The descriptive empirical analysis emphasizes the importance of compiling and contrasting various statistics about knowledge-based assets, incorporating sources which are specifically designed to map the creation and funding of R&D, as well as different notions of ownership over its outcomes. The paper concludes by highlighting a range of possible actions to help develop a more comprehensive understanding of the role of R&D funding, performance, exchange, and use decisions in global production and innovation networks.

A Portrait of U.S. Factoryless Goods Producers
Author(s):
Fariha Kamal, U.S. Census Bureau
Discussant(s):
Teresa Fort, Dartmouth College and NBER
Summary:

Kamal evaluates the Census Bureau's most recent data collection efforts to classify business entities in the U.S. economy that engage in an extreme form of production fragmentation called "factoryless" goods production. "Factoryless" goods-producing entities outsource physical transformation activities while retaining ownership of the intellectual property and control of sales to customers. Responses to a special inquiry on the incidence of purchases of contract manufacturing services in combination with data on production inputs and outputs, intellectual property, and international trade is used to identify and document characteristics of "factoryless" goods producing firms in the U.S. economy.

Downloads:

In addition to the conference paper, the research was distributed as NBER Working Paper w25193, which may be a more recent version.

Strategic Movement of Intellectual Property within Multinational Enterprises
Author(s):
Derrick Jenniges, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Raymond Mataloni Jr., Bureau of Economic Analysis
Sarah Stutzman, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Yiran Xin, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Discussant(s):
J. Bradford Jensen, Georgetown University and NBER
Summary:

Strategic behavior by U.S. multinational enterprises (MNEs) to shift profits between countries to reduce their worldwide tax burden has been well studied. Much of the existing research has focused on the use of debt payments and intrafirm intellectual property licensing agreements to explain why and how MNEs shift income across national borders. Although these tax strategies may become less important following the U.S. Tax Reform Act of 2017, there is evidence they have had a large impact on measures of economic activity in recent years. Jenniges, Mataloni Jr., Stutzman, and Xin explores how U.S. MNEs have used cost sharing agreements between U.S. parent companies and their foreign affiliates to shift profits to lower tax jurisdictions. The results are consistent with the researchers' hypothesis that having a cost sharing agreement is associated with lower profitability for U.S. parents and higher profitability for foreign affiliates. The results provide a microeconomic view of how strategic movement of intellectual property affects key measures in the national and international economic accounts, such as GDP and the trade balance.

Downloads:
Accounting for Firm Heterogeneity within U.S. Industries: Extended Supply-Use Tables and Trade in Value Added using Enterprise and Establishment Level Data
Author(s):
James Fetzer, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Tina Highfill, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Kassu Hossiso, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Thomas Howells, III, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Erich Strassner, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Jeffrey Young, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Discussant(s):
Susan Houseman, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research
Summary:

Fetzer, Highfill, Hossiso, Howells, Strassner, and Young present experimental trade-in-value added (TiVA) statistics estimated from extended supply-use tables (SUTs) for the United States for 2005 and 2012 that account for firm heterogeneity. The tables used to estimate the TiVA statistics extend supply-use tables for the United States by disaggregating the components of supply and use by multinational and other firms. The researchers also present preliminary output from microdata linking project between the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) and the U.S. Census Bureau on the U.S. semiconductor and other electronic components manufacturing industry to show how different firm characteristics account for heterogeneity within industries in an extended SUT framework. The rise of global value chains has increased the importance of measuring trade on a value added basis and identifying trade by multinational enterprises when analyzing bilateral trade flows. The researchers' experimental results show that imported content of exports as a share exports varies notably by firm-type within most industries, and that the imported content of exports is concentrated in a few industries, the largest being petroleum manufacturing. In addition, they find that half of the domestic value added content of exports by foreign-owned U.S. businesses is in chemicals, motor vehicles, wholesale trade, and machinery and that most of this content is embodied in imports from upstream foreign affiliates. Estimates based on the researchers' microdata linking project suggest that production patterns by ownership, firm class size, and export intensity each exhibit firm heterogeneity to some extent. The ownership criteria best accounts for heterogeneity in the value added share of production among the three criteria, while firm class size accounts for heterogeneity in the export share of production better than the ownership criteria. However, the three criteria are highly correlated and the researchers make no attempt here to isolate the individual effects of each.

Costa Rica: Integrating Foreign Direct Investment Data and Extended Supply and Use Tables into the National Accounts
Author(s):
Gabriela Saborio-Muñoz, Banco Central de Costa Rica
Rigoberto Torres-Mora, Banco Central de Costa Rica
Discussant(s):
Deborah Swenson, University of California, Davis and NBER
Summary:

Daily economic transactions are increasingly influenced by globalization, and there is growing demand for a better understanding of the impact of globalization within the economic accounts, and in particular its increasingly interconnected nature. This of course matters in all countries but in Costa Rica, which is a very open economy, the need to provide better evidence in this regard is more pressing than in many countries. Saborio-Muñoz and Torres-Mora highlight recent work carried out in Costa Rica to develop a set of Extended Supply-Use tables (E-SUT), under the auspices of the OECD Expert Group on Extended Supply and Use Tables, that have breakdowns by ownership structures, which are able to respond to many of these demands. Results show that the export industries with more propensity to create upstream domestic value added are those engaged in the exports of food and beverages and some services such as financial
management, computing activities and research and development. Additionally, the researchers go further by describing efforts within the Costa Rican statistical information system, to develop fully integrated international economic accounts - in other words, mechanisms and frameworks to ensure coherent and consistent national accounts and balance of payments statistics as part of a strengthening of integrated economic accounts. The framework of the 2017 national accounts will incorporate in the integrated economic accounts the disaggregation necessary to explicitly show accounts associated with FDI.

Downloads:
Accounting for Globalisation: Frameworks for Integrated International Economic Accounts
Author(s):
Discussant(s):
Christopher Kurz, Federal Reserve Board
Downloads:
Meaningful Information for Domestic Economies in the Light of Globalization – Will Additional Macroeconomic Indicators and Different Presentations Shed Light?
Author(s):
Paul Konijn, Eurostat
John Verrinder, European Statistical System
Henk Nijmeijer, Eurostat
Discussant(s):
Sarahelen Thompson, Bureau of Economic Analysis, retired
Summary:

Globalisation presents significant statistical challenges, particularly for small and open economies in terms of measuring macroeconomic level and growth indicators and communicating the results in a meaningful way. In the aftermath of the so-called "Irish case," Eurostat with its partners in the European Statistical System is looking into how, within the existing accounting frameworks, additional indicators and presentations of the accounts that allow users to follow domestic and global developments could be conceived. The work takes account of recommendations which have been developed by a high level group in Ireland for improving insight into the Irish economy. However it goes beyond that, as any new indicator or breakdown, particularly in a European context, should be comparable across countries and not be seen as a GDP or GNI "a la carte" for each country to choose from under specific circumstances. Stapel-Weber, Konijn, Verrinder, and Nijmeijer present the findings of the respective European work streams to date in terms of methodology, indicators, building new statistical infrastructural elements and new cooperation models between statistical compilers. It invites a critical review of the suggestions put forward.

In addition to the conference paper, the research was distributed as NBER Working Paper w24859, which may be a more recent version.

Eliminating the Pass-Through: Towards FDI Statistics that Better Capture the Financial and Economic Linkages between Countries
Author(s):
Discussant(s):
L. Kamran Bilir, University of Wisconsin at Madison and NBER
Summary:

MNEs play a central role in the creation and management of complex production networks, but FDI statistics can also reflect other factors, such as fiscal optimisation to reduce tax burdens and the increasing sophistication in MNEs' capital structures. This can make it difficult to interpret FDI statistics, in the sense that they are not 'real' and no longer represent "long-term" investments in a country. Moreover, this behaviour can further obscure the ultimate source and destination of FDI. Borga and Caliandro propose a framework to produce consolidated FDI statistics based on the nationality of the MNE group. These statistics would be a complement to the residency-based FDI statistics. While residency-based financial statistics are useful to know where financial claims and liabilities are created and held, nationality based statistics provide information on who makes the underlying decisions, who reaps the benefits, and who takes on the risk and needs to hold sufficient capital to cover potential losses. These statistics would be useful for better measuring financial integration
between economies and could also be used in conjunction with statistics on the operations of MNEs to analyse the relationship between the financing of MNEs and their operations. Rough estimates of the amount of pass-through capital in operating affiliates, rather than in SPEs, reveals that it is quite extensive, accounting for about one-third of the inward FDI positions in a selection of European countries. It also appears that pass-through capital is growing faster than 'real' FDI.

In addition to the conference paper, the research was distributed as NBER Working Paper w25029, which may be a more recent version.

Multinational Profit Shifting and Measures throughout Economic Accounts 
Author(s):
Jennifer Bruner, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Dylan Rassier, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Kim Ruhl, University of Wisconsin at Madison and NBER
Discussant(s):
Stephen Redding, Princeton University and NBER
Summary:

Profit shifting to low-tax countries imposes challenges for the treatment of multinational enterprises in economic accounts. Using adjustments for profit shifting calculated in Guvenen et al. (2017) under an alternative measurement methodology, Bruner, Rassier, and Ruhl empirically demonstrate how the effects of profit shifting cascade throughout a fully articulated set of economic accounts for the United States in 2014. They find a 1.5 percent and 3.5 percent increase in measured U.S. gross domestic product and operating surplus, respectively, and a 33.5 percent decrease in measured income receivable from the rest of world. As a result of offsetting effects, measured U.S. gross national saving decreases by 0.8 percent, and national borrowing increases by 6.9 percent. There are also potentially significant implications for analytic uses of the measures, including decreases for the labor share of income and the return on U.S. direct investment abroad of 1.4 to 2.4 percentage points and 4.3 percentage points, respectively, and increases for the trade in services balance as a percentage of GDP and the return on domestic non-financial business of 1.4 percentage points and 1.3 percentage points, respectively.

Downloads:
The Relationship between Tax Payments and MNE’s Patenting Activities and Implications for Real Economic Activity: Evidence from the Netherlands
Author(s):
Mark Vancauteren, Hasselt University
Michael Polder, Statistics Netherlands
Marcel van den Berg, Statistics Netherlands
Discussant(s):
Robert Yuskavage, Bureau of Economic Analysis, retired
Downloads:
The Role of Exporters and Domestic Producers in GVCs: Evidence for Belgium Based on Extended National Supply-and-Use Tables Integrated into a Global Multiregional Input-Output Table
Author(s):
Bernhard Michel, Belgian Federal Planning Bureau
Caroline Hambÿe, Belgian Federal Planning Bureau
Bart Hertveldt, Belgian Federal Planning Bureau
Discussant(s):
Lucian Cernat, European Commission
Summary:

Michel, Hambÿe, and Hertveldt introduce firm heterogeneity into Belgian supply-and-use and input-output tables by disaggregating manufacturing industries into exporters and non-exporters. As a further step, the resulting Belgian export heterogeneous input-output table is integrated into the global input-output table of the World Input-Output Database (WIOD). Based on these tables, the researchers test for differences in input structures and import behavior of exporters and non-exporters and analyse their integration into domestic and global value chains. According to their results, exporters and non-exporters in Belgian manufacturing industries are indeed different in terms of input structures and import behavior: the production processes of exporters are more fragmented, in particular internationally. This result confirms prior findings in the literature on firm heterogeneity in international trade. Regarding the roles of exporters and domestic firms in global value chains (GVCs), the researchers find that Belgian manufacturing exporters participate in GVCs mainly through their purchases of imported intermediate inputs for producing exports (backward integration), while domestic producers participate in GVCs mostly through deliveries of intermediate inputs for export production (forward integration).

Downloads:

In addition to the conference paper, the research was distributed as NBER Working Paper w25155, which may be a more recent version.

Measuring Bilateral Exports of Value Added: A Unified Framework
Author(s):
Bart Los, University of Groningen
Marcel Timmer, University of Groningen
Discussant(s):
Robert Johnson, University of Notre Dame and NBER
Summary:

Los and Timmer provide a unified framework for measuring the domestic value added content of bilateral exports. They outline a general methodology that encompasses the well-known measures introduced by Koopman et al. (2012) (domestic value added in exports) and Johnson and Noguera (2012) (value added consumed abroad) which the researchers refer to as VAX-D and VAXC. In addition they suggest a novel third measure, VAX-P, that indicates the value added absorbed abroad in the final stage of production. The researchers show how the measures are related and can all be derived with the method of hypothetical extraction in a general input-output model outlined in Los et al. (2016). In addition they show that for VAX-C and VAX-P the sum of bilateral measures is equal to the corresponding unilateral measure, but this is not necessarily true for VAX-D. Los and Timmer illustrate all measures with some numerical examples using the World Input-Output Database.

Downloads:
National Accounts for a Global Economy: The Case of Ireland
Author(s):
John FitzGerald, Trinity College Dublin
Discussant(s):
James Tebrake, Statistics Canada
Summary:

Globalisation is affecting the way economic activity is reflected in the national accounts. Intellectual property, which is now part of the capital stock, interacts with the choice of global firms as to their legal structure, producing different national accounting outcomes for individual countries. This is but one manifestation of the challenges that a global economy presents for national accounting. Using the example of Ireland, consideration is given to the data needed to meet the needs of users of national accounts. In particular, more information is required to separately identify all the activity of multinational enterprises and domestically owned firms. FitzGerald suggests a set of satellite accounts for Ireland that would show how changes in the economy affect the economic welfare of Irish residents.

Downloads:
R&D Capitalisation: Where Did We Go Wrong?
Author(s):
Mark de Haan, Statistics Netherlands
Joseph Haynes, Statistics Netherlands
Discussant(s):
Michael Connolly, Central Statistics Office - Ireland
Summary:

Globalisation and the activities of multinational enterprises (MNEs) present an increasing challenge for macroeconomic measures particularly those designed to reflect domestic economies. The very presence of MNEs goes against the basic idea of there being an identifiable and measurable domestic economy consisting of domestic consumers and producers. In a globalised world with limited to no trade barriers, MNEs will operate across multiple national economies, often under a single management or control structure. One of the serious problems that MNEs present for macroeconomic measurement is the issue of assigning economic ownership of Intellectual Property (IP) to the various fractions of a global value chain and therefore to domestic economies. This is an issue for which the international guidance is currently incomplete and still under research by national accountants. De Haan and Haynes an attempt to contribute to the discussion of R&D capitalisation by establishing a bridge between the micro and macro worlds. This translation of information on the MNE's business structure to the National Accounts framework will give an indication of real world distortions that national accountants will encounter when measuring the activities of MNEs on a domestic economy basis. By looking at the issue from the perspective of the entire global MNEs activities, rather than from the fractional views as exposed by domestic economy level data, the researchers aim to provide new input into the discussion on how economic ownership of IPs should be understood in a future version of the SNA.

Downloads:

Participants

Below is a list of conference attendees.
Thomas Alexander, International Monetary Fund
Maksim Belenkiy, U.S. International Trade Administration
Benjamin Bridgman, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Lucy Eldridge, Bureau of Labor Statistics
Paul Farello, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Michael Hardie, Office for National Statistics
Derek Hill, National Science Foundation
John Jankowski, Social Security Administration
Tjeerd Jellema, European Central Bank
Lin Jones, U.S. International Trade Commission
Arnold Katz, Bureau of Economic Analysis, retired
Gregory Kurtzon, Bureau of Labor Statistics
Silvia Matei, International Monetary Fund
Rita Mesias, International Monetary Fund
Sabrina Pabilonia, Bureau of Labor Statistics
John Pitzer, International Monetary Fund
Rachel Soloveichik, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Nuno Sousa, European Commission
Nick Vaughan, Office for National Statistics
Randal Verbrugge, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Heather Wickramarachi, U.S. International Trade Commission

More from NBER

In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Retirement and Disability, and the Bulletin on Health — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.

Economics of Digitization Figure 1
  • Article
The NBER Economics of Digitization Project, established in 2010 with support from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation,...
claudiagoldinpromoimagelecture.png
  • Lecture
Claudia Goldin, the Henry Lee Professor of Economics at Harvard University and a past president of the American...
2020 Methods Lecture Promo Image
  • Lecture
The extent to which individual responses to household surveys are protected from discovery by outside parties depends...