Well-being Analysis Favours a Virus-Elimination Strategy for COVID-19
A well-being approach requires looking beyond COVID-19 deaths to compare the performance of elimination versus mitigation strategies as measured by other important supports for well-being. What do the data show? Our comparison based on 2020 data shows a virus elimination strategy to be more successful than other options, whether measured in terms of COVID-19 deaths, overall excess deaths, income, unemployment, trust, or mental and physical health. Countries that chose and followed a strategy of reducing community transmission to zero and keeping it there saved lives and better protected income and employment, all without obvious costs to either the social fabric or the mental health of their populations.
-
-
Copy CitationJohn F. Helliwell, Max B. Norton, Shun Wang, Lara B. Aknin, and Haifang Huang, "Well-being Analysis Favours a Virus-Elimination Strategy for COVID-19," NBER Working Paper 29092 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3386/w29092.Download Citation
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
