Inversions in US Presidential Elections: 1836-2016

Michael Geruso, Dean Spears, Ishaana Talesara

NBER Working Paper No. 26247
Issued in September 2019
NBER Program(s):, The Public Economics Program, The Political Economy Program

Inversions—in which the popular vote winner loses the election—have occurred in 4 US Presidential elections. We show that rather than being statistical flukes, inversions have been ex ante likely since the 1800s. In elections yielding a popular vote margin within one percentage point (which has happened in one-eighth of Presidential elections), 40% will be inversions in expectation. Inversion probabilities are asymmetric, in various periods favoring Whigs, Democrats, or Republicans. Feasible policy changes—including awarding each state’s Electoral College ballots proportionally between parties rather than awarding all to the state winner—could substantially reduce inversion probabilities, though not in close elections.

You may purchase this paper on-line in .pdf format from SSRN.com ($5) for electronic delivery.

Supplementary materials for this paper:

• The University of Texas Electoral College Study

Acknowledgments and Disclosures

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w26247