The COVID-19 Pandemic and Innovation in Remote Work Technologies

07/01/2026
Summary of working paper 35083
Featured in print Digest
This figure is a line chart titled "Share of US Patent Applications Related to Work from Home," showing the monthly share of US patent applications containing work-from-home related terms from approximately 2010 through 2025. The y-axis represents the share of patent applications related to work from home, ranging from 0.30% to 0.80% in increments of 0.10 percentage points. The x-axis represents time, spanning from 2010 to 2025 in five-year increments. A vertical dashed line marks the month preceding the WHO declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic, occurring in early 2020. From 2010 to approximately 2014, the share fluctuated between roughly 0.40% and 0.60% before declining gradually to a low of around 0.38% by 2020. Immediately following the COVID-19 pandemic marker in early 2020, the share increased sharply and persistently, rising from approximately 0.40% to a peak near 0.79% around 2024. The share then declined somewhat but remained elevated near 0.73% as of 2025, remaining well above pre-pandemic levels throughout the post-2020 period. The source line reads: "Researchers' calculations of the share of technical expositions with Work from Home related terms using data from the United States Patent and Trademark Office."

In the spring of 2020, roughly half of all paid labor in the United States was performed from home. Although that share declined as the COVID-19 pandemic receded, the share of full paid workdays supplied remotely has remained over 25 percent since 2023, approximately four times the pre-pandemic level.

In Demand-Driven Technical Change: Evidence from WFH Technologies (NBER Working Paper 35083), Steven J. DavisNicholas Bloom, and Mihai A. Codreanu investigate whether the pandemic steered inventive activity toward technologies that facilitate working from home. They analyze the text of approximately 5.6 million US patent applications filed between January 2010 and July 2025 and published by March 2026. They construct a dictionary of 49 terms spanning four categories—communication and collaboration, remote access and digital infrastructure, home-based work, and flexible and mobile work—and search for these terms across patent titles, abstracts, claims, and descriptions. A patent application is classified as supporting work from home (WFH) if it contains at least one term from this dictionary.

The COVID-19 pandemic shifted innovation, particularly by corporations, toward technologies that are associated with remote work.

The share of patent applications advancing WFH technologies rose by approximately 60 percent in the three years following the start of the pandemic. As of mid-2025, the share was still more than 50 percent above its pre-pandemic level of 0.42 percent. The persistence of the higher patent share suggests that the rise in this share was not due only to firms rushing to patent nearly completed WFH innovations in the first few months of the pandemic.

The largest gains in patent activity appear in audio and speech processing, telecommunications, computing, healthcare IT, and optics. At a more granular level, video telephony and transmission, telephone exchange systems, speech recognition, and audio signal processing show the most pronounced increases. These are precisely the technology areas underpinning platforms such as Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Cisco Webex.

Corporations drove the WFH innovation response, with their WFH patent share rising from roughly 0.5 percent to about 0.8 percent. Universities, in contrast, showed no discernible increase. This pattern is consistent with the theory that profit incentives, rather than curiosity-driven research agendas, drove the innovation response. Among individual firms, Zoom showed the largest absolute increase in WFH patent volume, followed by Huawei, Sony, Beijing Dajia Internet Information Technology, and Dell.


The researchers acknowledge support from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, the Hoover Institution, Stanford Economics, and the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.