The Regulatory Burden of Licensure Sales Laws: New Evidence on Race and the U.S. Tobacco Market
Licensure sales requirements are commonly justified as consumer protection regulations intended to improve seller compliance and reduce harm associated with risky products. However, licensure effects may differ across communities with heterogeneous enforcement intensity and seller responses. We study this question in the context of e-cigarette retail licensure laws (ERLLs), a policy intended to regulate access to e-cigarettes among youth. We find that state ERLLs with strong penalties for non-compliance reduce nicotine vaping among Black youths by 2.5-4.0 percentage points but have no effect on White youths. This racially disparate finding is driven by heterogeneous supply-side responses to increased regulatory burden. Vendors in Black neighborhoods are more likely to be targeted for inspections than those in White neighborhoods despite having lower pre-treatment rates of infractions. Moreover, vendors in Black neighborhoods are also less likely to sell e-cigarettes following ERLL adoption, consistent with a racially disparate regulatory burden. Together, our results suggest important distributional consequences of licensure requirements.
-
-
Copy CitationDhaval M. Dave, Jooyoung Kim, and Joseph J. Sabia, "The Regulatory Burden of Licensure Sales Laws: New Evidence on Race and the U.S. Tobacco Market," NBER Working Paper 35848 (2026), https://doi.org/10.3386/w35848.Download Citation
Related
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals—the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, the Bulletin on the Economics of Alzheimer's, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship—as well as research spotlights, lectures, and panel videos.
