Prices Versus Quantities Revisited: What Do Policymakers Need to Know to Set Pigouvian Taxes and Subsidies?
What information do policymakers need to design Pigouvian taxes or subsidies? Standard logic suggests that it is sufficient to know the size of the externality and unnecessary to know about quantities. Yet this logic is incorrect if interventions have fixed costs, taxes create deadweight losses, or there are distributional concerns. We present a model in which these considerations can make it more valuable for policymakers to learn about equilibrium quantities. We apply the model to congestion pricing, which has high fixed costs, and to a proposed housing subsidy in Boston that features deadweight losses and distributional concerns.
-
-
Copy CitationDenise Dipasquale, Edward L. Glaeser, Adam M. Guren, and Paul S. Willen, "Prices Versus Quantities Revisited: What Do Policymakers Need to Know to Set Pigouvian Taxes and Subsidies?," NBER Working Paper 35376 (2026), https://doi.org/10.3386/w35376.Download Citation
Related
Programs
Working Groups
More from the NBER
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
