Alternative Compensation Arrangements and Productive Efficiency in Partnerships: Evidence from Medical Group Practice

Martin Gaynor, Mark Pauly

NBER Working Paper No. 2170 (Also Reprint No. r1480)
Issued in February 1987
NBER Program(s):Health Economics

Although the role of the services sector in the economy has grown increasingly large, and partnerships are a prevalent form of organization in this sector, relatively little is known about the behavior and performance of these firms. In this paper an attempt is made to fill that gap by developing and testing a model of the effect of alternative compensation arrangements on productive efficiency in medical group practices. The technique employed is two-stage production frontier estimation. This technique provides direct estimates of productive efficiency and allows for differences across agents in ability or responsiveness to financial incentives. In the frontier literature productive efficiency is assumed to be exogenously given. In this paper it is determined endogenously, thus a simple econometric technique correcting for this endogeneity in estimating the production frontier is employed. In addition, the measures of efficiency themselves can be made dependent variables for explicit econometric analysis of the determinants of efficiency. Overall, the empirical results are consistent with theoretical work on internal theory of the firm, which predicts that productivity compensation schemes will work well for firms with non-joint production and observable output. These two criteria are met by medical group practices. The treatment of measured efficiency as an endogenous variable is unique and allows some interesting insights into the determinants of productive efficiency. We find that relating compensation to productivity does increase the quantity and efficiency of production, as theory has hypothesized. The number of members in a group decreases both the quantity produced and the efficiency with which that output is produced. Experience does lead to greater productivity and efficiency. Medical groups in general are measured as being no less efficient than an average manufacturing firm, but Health Maintenance Organizations are less efficient than average.

download in pdf format
   (329 K)

download in djvu format
   (229 K)

email paper

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w2170

Published: "Compensation and Productive Efficiency in Partnerships: Evidence from Medical Group Practice." From Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 3, pp. 544-573, (June 1990).

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these:
Gaynor, Rebitzer, and Taylor w8522 Incentives in HMOs
Gaynor w1866 Internal Non-Price Competition, Pricing, and Incentive Systems in the Cooperative Service Firm: The Case of US Medical Group Practice
Barro and Beaulieu w10017 Selection and Improvement: Physician Responses to Financial Incentives
Scholes and Wolfson w3092 Converting Corporations to Partnerships through Leverage: Theoretical and Practical Impediments
Hendershott w3880 Are Real House Prices Likely to Decline by 47 Percent?
NBER Videos

National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-868-3900; email:

Contact Us