Empirical Policy Analysis Unit
OECD Environment Directorate
2 rue Andre Pascal
75775 Paris Cedex 16
Institutional Affiliation: OECD
Information about this author at RePEc
NBER Working Papers and Publications
|January 2008||Renewable Energy Policies And Technological Innovation: Evidence Based On Patent Counts|
with Ivan Hascic, David Popp: w13760
This paper examines the effect of environmental policies on technological innovation in the specific case of renewable energy. The analysis is conducted using patent data on a panel of 25 countries over the period 1978-2003. It is found that public policy plays a significant role in determining patent applications. Different types of policy instruments are effective for different renewable energy sources.
Published: Nick Johnstone & Ivan HaÅ¡ÄiÄ & David Popp, 2010. "Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 45(1), pages 133-155, January. citation courtesy of
|September 2007||Policy vs. Consumer Pressure: Innovation and Diffusion of Alternative Bleaching Technologies in the Pulp Industry|
with David Popp, Tamara Hafner: w13439
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, concern over dioxin in both paper products and wastewater led to the development of techniques that reduced the use of chlorine in the pulp industry. Both regulatory and consumer pressure motivated this change. We use patent data to examine the evolution of two completing bleaching technologies in five major paper-producing countries, both of which reduce the use of chlorine in the pulping process. By the end of the 1990s, nearly all pulp production in these countries used one of these technologies. Unlike other papers using patents to study environmentally-friendly innovation, we focus on a process innovation, rather than on end-of-the-pipe solutions to pollution. Moreover, while previous studies emphasize the importance of regulation for inducing innova...
Published: Research Policy Volume 40, Issue 9, November 2011, Pages 1253–1268