Laure B. de Preux
Imperial College London,
South Kensington Campus
London SW7 2AZ
Institutional Affiliations: LSE & Imperial College and Centre for Economic Performance, LSE
NBER Working Papers and Publications
|June 2013||Industry Compensation Under Relocation Risk: A Firm-Level Analysis of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme|
with Ralf Martin, Mirabelle Muûls, Ulrich J. Wagner: w19097
When regulated firms are offered compensation to prevent them from relocating, efficiency requires that payments be distributed across firms so as to equalize marginal relocation probabilities, weighted by the damage caused by relocation. We formalize this fundamental economic logic and apply it to analyzing compensation rules proposed under the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, where emission permits are allocated free of charge to carbon intensive and trade exposed industries. We show that this practice results in substantial overcompensation for given carbon leakage risk. Efficient permit allocation reduces the aggregate risk of job loss by more than half without increasing aggregate compensation.
Published: Ralf Martin & Mirabelle Mu?ls & Laure B. de Preux & Ulrich J. Wagner, 2014. "Industry Compensation under Relocation Risk: A Firm-Level Analysis of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(8), pages 2482-2508, August. citation courtesy of
|September 2011||The Impacts of the Climate Change Levy on Manufacturing: Evidence from Microdata|
with Ralf Martin, Ulrich J. Wagner: w17446
We estimate the impacts of the Climate Change Levy (CCL) on manufacturing plants using panel data from the UK production census. Our identification strategy builds on the comparison of outcomes between plants subject to the CCL and plants that were granted an 80% discount on the levy after joining a Climate Change Agreement (CCA). Exploiting exogenous variation in eligibility for CCA participation, we find that the CCL had a strong negative impact on energy intensity and electricity use. We cannot reject the hypothesis that the tax had no detrimental effects on economic performance and on plant exit.