Did the New Deal Solidify the 1932 Democratic Realignment?
The critical election of 1932 represented a turning point in the future electoral successes of the Democrats and Republicans for over three decades. This paper seeks to measure the importance of the New Deal in facilitating the Democrats' control of the federal government well into the 1960s. We test whether long-differences in the county-level electoral support for Democratic presidential candidates after the 1930s can be attributed to New Deal interventions into local economies. We also investigate more narrowly whether voters rewarded Roosevelt from 1932 to 1936 and from 1936 to 1940 for his efforts to stimulate depressed local economies. Our instrumental variables estimates indicate that increasing a county's per capita New Deal relief and public works spending from nothing to the sample mean ($277) would have increased the long-run support for the Democratic party by 10 percentage points. We further find that the long-run shift toward the Democratic party after 1928 was not a function of the Roosevelt landslide victory in 1932. Roosevelt's ability to win over voters during the 1936 and 1940 elections, however, did matter for the long-term.
Fishback's and Kantor's work on the New Deal has been supported by National Science Foundation Grants SBR-9708098, SES-0080324, SES-0214395, SES-0617942, SES-0617972, and SES- 0921732. We are solely responsible for the views expressed in the article. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Kantor, Shawn & Fishback, Price V. & Wallis, John Joseph, 2013. "Did the New Deal solidify the 1932 Democratic realignment?," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 620-633. citation courtesy of
Did the New Deal Solidify the 1932 Democratic Realignment?, Shawn Kantor, Price V. Fishback, John J. Wallis. in The Microeconomics of New Deal Policy, Fishback. 2013